Virginia Voters for Animal Welfare

Responsible Government

Responsible Ownership

Responsible Breeding

 

Home

2006 Alerts

2007 Initiatives

2006 Initiatives

Meet the Board

Join Us: 
            
Get on our Email List 
             Join VVAW Yahoo Group
             Join VVAW
             Join VAW

Get Active: 
         Contact Legislators  
            Guide for Local Level Work  
           
2006 Animal Laws

About Us

Animal Welfare Issues:
            
Gas Chambers 
           
Animal Licensing 
            Pet Overpopulation Study 
            
Virginia Statistics

Meetings:
          
2006 Meeting Schedule 
          
Meeting Minutes 
           Photos

Contact Us

Archives

 

 

You are here: Home>>>Gas Chambers>>>Developments

FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) of chamber information

We attempted to get the interior dimensions of the chambers (plus other information such as the date of manufacture, of what material the chamber is made, the size of the door to the chamber, the location of the viewing glass so that the operator of the chamber can watch to make sure the animals are dying as they are supposed to, and service records for the chamber); most jurisdictions were forthcoming with their dimensions.

In no case was the dimension of the chamber large enough to hold two average sized dogs at the same time. Some were of sufficient size to hold two cats, however, although the cats are each to be individually crated.

The new regs, when followed, create a cycle for killing a dog that takes about an hour from the time the dog is taken from the run until the time the dog’s body is hauled away and disposed of and the chamber cleaned and readied for the next gassing. The time would be the same for cats although two might be gassed in the same cycle.

With the animal records of the jurisdiction in hand (and, as you recall, not all animal records for 2004 were on line from the State Vet – yet another story), and some records were received only by another FOIA request, we were able to estimate the time spent in killing dogs by a single jurisdiction. It got as high as half a year’s time for a pound employee – that person doing nothing more than killing dogs for 6 months of the year. (We use dogs here in the example because some gassing jurisdictions do not accept cats at all; public pounds are not required to provide for cats or any companion animal other than dogs – yet another story.)

We provided these calculations to jurisdictions, and at the same time suggested that the cost of EBI (euthanasia by injection) is far less expensive and far less time-consuming than gassing to say nothing of being more humane.

Return to Gas Chambers main page.

Updated: 12/20/06